Home Health and Hunger

Nanci, a good friend of mine since nursing school, recently left her position as CCU (Critical Care Unit) RN at our large regional hospital. Like me, my friend is a lifelong learner (probably why we’re friends), and after obtaining her CCRN certification, she decided to move on to her next care-giving learning experience, one with better hours and less stress—home health. She’s been at it since the end of October, and after only a few days in the field, she texted me, overwhelmed by the poverty she was seeing up close. “I had no idea, and I thought of Little Free Pantry. Maybe there’d be some way LFP can help.” One of the homes she visited had no running water. Its single working stove burner provided heat.

To qualify for home health care, a person must be homebound; if a person can get to outpatient physical therapy, that person does not qualify. This means most folks who receive home health care are elderly. According to National Association for Home Care and Hospice 2010 statistics, of the 12 million receiving home health care, 69% were over 65. With the “graying of America” well underway, I imagine that number is higher now, and medicare enrollment is expected to more than double over the next 15 years.

When I was in nursing, I had a particularly soft spot for geriatric patients. I guess I have a particularly soft spot for this population more generally because since the LFP Project inception, it’s really bothered me that LFP isn’t a solution for homebound seniors; like most bricks and mortar pantries, folks go to it. 



I told Nanci I’d think about it.

Food security involves several components—access, distribution, stability…. In America we have more than enough food for everyone. For those doing hunger work, distribution is often the most challenging part. Mobile food pantries are trending, but these usually work through host locations, and folks must still go to them. Hard for the homebound. This is why Meals on Wheels is such a critical social support (and why you should call your Senators/MOCs and ask them to increase its budget funding). But Nanci’s patients often aren’t even getting that. Unlike the home I mentioned in the first paragraph, most do have a way to prepare their own food.

Then, I remembered six area law enforcement agencies had recently partnered with our local food bank. Officers receive boxes of food for distribution on their beat, feeding folks, building relationships.

Nanci works M-F, seeing around eight patients a day. Her agency employs eight RNs. These have a similar case load. More LPNs and therapists. Estimating, the RNs at this single agency make 320 house calls a week. 


What if home health care providers partnered with anti-hunger agencies, empowering their nurses to utilize the two-question food insecurity screening tool and equipping them with healthy, emergency food supplies to promote nourishment and healing?


These nurses would not only be feeding the old, sick, and hungry. They’d be uniquely positioned to conduct assessments tracking outcomes of healthy food as intervention for a demographic that will only grow. As the most trusted profession, they would also be uniquely positioned to provide point of care nutrition education.

Law of Unintended Consequences

Letting you know up front some of this content is tough.

Today is World AIDS Day. I probably wouldn’t have written about it had it not been for Bono’s recent appearance on Jimmy Kimmel. (U2 fan from way back, Achtung Baby and *gasp* Zooropa, favorites.) (RED) Campaign spokesperson since its inception, Bono talked about this year’s campaign, which raised $500 million dollars. At the end, Kimmel cut to a video of the “currently unemployed” President Obama, who says, “Hi everybody. This World AIDS Day, everyone has a role to play.” Huh? I thought we had this. And here we are.

The 2014 Scientific American article, “Food Security and the Fight Against HIV/AIDS,” corroborated in fact much of what I guessed about AIDS trends, noting several achievements: new infection decline, 61% accessibility to antiretroviral therapy (ART), AIDS-related mortality dropping from its 2.3 million peak in 2005 to 1.6 million in 2012. However, declines, accessibility…these things aren’t happening across the board, and one of the drivers of inequity in sub-Saharan Africa is…you guessed it, food insecurity. Predictably, those infected with HIV/AIDS have higher medical expenses. They miss work. All of which exacerbates food insecurity and affects outcomes. Also predictable but something I hadn’t let myself think about much, hungry people engage in transactional sex, increasing transmission.

US trends are even better, but inequity still complicates. People of color are disproportionately affected, and a highly publicized 2010 CDC study suggests infection among heterosexuals living in inner-cities most depends on poverty; rates doubled among those living below the poverty line. The surveyed were not IV drug users, though they could have been more proximate to them. The CDC 2016 “Today’s HIV/AIDS Epidemic” fact sheet blurb about poverty as an exacerbating socioeconomic factor implies an additional reason: "Those who cannot afford the basics in life may end up in circumstances that increase their risk for HIV infection." (Emphasis mine.) Transactional sex.

Last Fall, Urban Institute and Feeding America released details of another highly publicized study, “Impossible Choices: Teens and Food Insecurity in America”. Focus group conversations with teens in ten communities across the country revealed, "Teens in all 10 communities talked about some young people 'selling their body' or using 'sex for money' to make ends meet. However, these themes were strongest in high-poverty communities."A young woman from Portland, OR, told researchers, “It’s really like selling yourself. Like you’ll do whatever you need to do to get money or eat.”

I warned you.

Back in Africa…Having recognized systemic inequity as the barrier in the fight against HIV/AIDS, over the last decade PEPFAR (the United States Government’s President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), UNAIDS (the joint United Nations program on HIV/AIDS), and WFP (World Food Programme) have facilitated increased adoption of food and nutrition security policies within larger HIV and AIDS policies. Among the $2.2 billion in proposed budget cuts to our global world health program, President Trump proposes to cut PEPFAR (an agency begun by George W. Bush) funding by 17% with total cuts of $800 million to the HIV/AIDS global health program. One day ago, the (One) Campaign cited a Kaiser Family Foundation report projecting these cuts could result in nearly 300,000 deaths and more than 1.75 million new infections each year. Organizations everywhere, including the Gates Foundation, are ringing alarm bells; they see proposed cuts as a sign of US retreat from the global fight against AIDS.  

Today, back in the US, the GOP is lining up votes for a tax bill analysts say will add $1 trillion to the deficit, and anti-hunger organizations are ringing their own alarm bells. It remains to be seen whether the bill will pass and if so, how lawmakers will balance the federal budget. What seems certain is withdrawal of funds for the global fight against HIV/AIDS will cause new infection rates to rise again after a decade of retreat, and withdrawal of funds to support hungry folks will mean more hungry folks. Some of those will do whatever they need to do to feed themselves and their families.

unintended-consequences-1-blog.jpg